Home Teachers | Mentors | Discussions | Research | Find
   Stream MonitoringGuided Research Research Question   
The PathFinder Science Network

Creating
 the Context

  Home
  Research Focus
  Background Info
  Research Methods
  Data Submission
  Results of Study
  Data Analysis
  Conclusion
  Further Research


Guided
 Research

  Research Question
  Background Info
  Research Methods
  Data Submission
  Results of Study
  Data Analysis
  Conclusion
  Further Research
  Research Values


Student
 Research

  Doing Research
  Publish
  View


Tools
  Discussions
  Stream Teams
  Water Links

   

The Research Question we will pursue for this guided research on streams:

How does the Water Quality Index change between the headwaters and the mouth of a stream?

So how did we come up this this research question?

Science depends on several assumptions about our universe; such as the universe has regular patterns that human beings can comprehend. Theories are the tentative explanations of our understanding of these patterns and how phenomena may operate in the universe. The pursuit of understanding requires that the researcher acquire and foster certain attitudes; such as questioning, disciplined curiosity, open-mindedness, with-holding judgment, respect for evidence balanced with skepticism, intellectual honesty, a sense of responsibility, and an understanding of one's competence and limitations.

Many theories can be thought of as developing in five interrelated and overlapping stages. The first is a period of extensive observation of nature or analyzing the results of experiments or in our case this is Creating the Context. Second, these observations lead scientists to ponder questions of "how" and "why." In the course of answering these questions, scientists infer explanations or make conjectures as working hypotheses. Third, in most cases, scientists submit hypotheses to formal, rigorous tests to check the validity of the hypotheses. At this point the hypotheses can be confirmed, falsified and rejected, not supported with evidence, or modified based on the evidence. This is a stage of experimentation. Fourth, scientists propose formal explanations by making public presentations at professional meetings or publishing their results in peer-reviewed journals. Finally, adoption of an explanation is recognized by other scientists as they begin referring to and using the explanation in their research and publications (1998, National Research Council).

Before planning an investigation, the researcher first recognizes a question or a problem to be studied. Although questions need not be derived from a theory, theories often guide researchers in predicting events or outcomes of research which ultimately support or deny the explanation. You have spent time investigating your stream and you are ready to state an interesting question in a more formal manner. Questions about observable events related to the stream are the basis of our work.

Research Ideas

    The following are some ideas about streams that could lead to interesting research areas about streams:

  • The effects of humidity, temperature, clouds, or solar radiation on the temperature of the water.
  • Determination of diurnal (day/night cycle) and levels of various chemicals in the stream.
  • Seasonal variations and the changes in the stream
  • Determination of changes in a stream from the headwater to the mouth.
  • Topographic and vegetation differences referred to as "land use" in the watershed and the Water Quality Index.

    As you have reviewed the information and worked with your stream you may have come up with some of your own ideas and questions. Your ideas should be added to this growing list of ideas, that may grow into research questions. Click on a link to read ideas submitted by others involved in the project. It is also an opportunity to respond to an idea or research question posted here.
    You may type a new research ideas and your comments in the boxes below. ERROR:
    Missing required data.